OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

[Kevin Gunn]

hey Matthias,
after reading the bug, it's implied the binaries being asked for removal
were somehow built with gl (possibly sw implementation of gl?)....please
cmiiaw

as to the request, never say never, but at least i've never seen an arm
chipset in the wild with a gl enabled gpu (like the bug indicates they're
all gles).
so i'm not sure of the value of having those binaries present where at
least in real application, there's no gl ?

br,kg

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> LP: #1586026 asks for the removal of binary packages on arm64 which cannot
> be
> built with OpenGL ES.  Do we really have to cripple an architecture like
> this?
> I don't see any discussion about this.  How does this affect things like
> GPU
> accelerators and CUDA aware packages?
>
> Matthias
>
> --
> ubuntu-devel mailing list
> ubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/attachments/20160603/dbcb34a4/attachment.html>