[long] Canonical are you serious?

Matt Zimmerman mdz at ubuntu.com
Tue Jan 25 01:03:02 UTC 2005


On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:32:35PM +0800, Enrico Zini wrote:

> It occurred to me just now that app-specific documentation may already be
> part of the arch import the devels work on.  In that case, our patches may
> clash with patches the devels are doing, and it may be wiser to work with
> that arch repository or sending patches to the devels instead of doing
> another branch ourselves.

> If that is true (I can't check it atm, but mdz, mako or others please
> confirm on this), we don't need symlinks and we would just need to work
> with a vendor drop of the Gnome User's Guide
> (http://www.gnome.org/learn/users-guide/2.6/) which wouldn't need
> symlinks, so we could do with any version of subversion and be all
> happy.

Yes, all of this will be imported into arch eventually, but it isn't there
yet, and I don't think there is a set timeline for it at this time.
As I mentioned in an earlier message, the Ubuntu development team are not
using Arch for source code managemnt on a grand scale yet.

-- 
 - mdz




More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list