KUDOS -- Unofficial Kubuntu FAQ
matthew.east.ubuntu at breathe.com
matthew.east.ubuntu at breathe.com
Tue Jul 12 13:44:24 UTC 2005
Rob writes:
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 09:23 -0400, Jonathan Jesse wrote:
>> Spent some time helping out people on #kubntu today and someone kept
>> recomending to newbies two things that I'm not quite sure we should be.
>>
>> The first is a sources list found at http://giannaros.org/sources.list which
>> inlcude backports, are we recomending backports and automatically adding
>> universe to things?
> In the official FAQ I have removed backports from the sources.list.
> There is no need to use backports anymore apart from installing such
> things as livdvdcss2, something we cant recommend people do anyway
> (patent/copyright issues). Universe however is in there.
My view on backports: we can support them, as for breezy the backports
repository _should_ be official and on an Ubuntu server. Equally any legal
problems should be resolved if the backports are to become official. However
at the same time I believe that it is important to give users the ability to
choose whether to activate backports or not: there is an information gap
that we can fill by explaining properly in our guides what the activation of
backports entails, and what the pros and cons are.
Matt
More information about the ubuntu-doc
mailing list