Wiki Cleanup Proposal

[Matthew East]

On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 22:51 -0800, Brian Burger wrote:
> On 2/19/06, GrAnT GaLbRaiTh <manicka at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > But what about the whole concept in general? Once we agree on going in
> > this direction then we can refine the structure of the Beta page. Do
> > you like the overall idea of reorganising the userdoc page in this
> > way?
> 
> Yes, overall I think UserDocBeta is great, I just think that some of
> the subpages that've been created have been overkill, like the great
> profusion of browser pages - do Lynx & Links really have that much
> stuff in the wiki devoted to them? (I know Opera doesn't, and suspect
> the same of the other two browsers.)
> 
> Long lists of links aren't great for usability, but deep layers of
> index pages before you get to the actual content aren't great either.

Yes, I agree. I think this can be avoided by simply adopting the current
structure of UserDocumentation. This will save time and ensure that the
proposal can be implemented quickly.

Another question is, should the other index pages be subpages of the
Documentation page? i.e. Documentation/Multimedia, Documentation/Servers

If they are to be pure indexes, I think they could be subpages.

Matt
-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20060220/7e275870/attachment.pgp>