The value of separating the doc wiki

[Matthew East]

On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 12:07 +1300, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2006, at 10:37 AM, Matthew East wrote:
> >
> > Corey Burger <corey.burger <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> So the CC met today and didn't fully understand why the doc team 
> >> wants to seperate about the docs. Basically we need to communicate 
> >> what we can solve by moving wikis.
> >
> > Ok, I was pretty annoyed that I missed the discussion and wasn't able 
> > to try and help communicate this too, but after a brief seething 
> > period over statements like "the plan should be worked out completely 
> > before we start moving things around for no apparent reason" (I have 
> > been thinking and working on this spec with Henrik and Corey for 
> > something like 6 months), I realised, as Corey says, that we need to 
> > make an effort to help people to get over the barriers that are
> > currently there.
> > ...
> 
> If someone can link to the log of the meeting from 
> <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/>, I can help complete the spec to 
> address the issues raised in the meeting. (It's odd that the Design 
> section has only one sentence, for example.)

I've started trying to make the spec more persuasive. Part of the
problem is that I had never imagined that the CC would be reviewing the
spec, so I hadn't bothered about this before, but now I see the need to
make this convincing.

I'd love it if people would have a look at the revised spec and suggest
any improvements.

Matt
-- 
mdke at ubuntu.com
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20060222/aee9c2d1/attachment.pgp>