CommonQuestions

[Matthew East]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



* Francis Giannaros:
> On Monday 10 July 2006 07:51, Matthew East wrote:
>> No, I'm saying that not having full phrased question in the sub-headings
>> is essential before including such headings in a table of contents (see
>> the first paragraph from my previous email quoted above).
> 
> Ok, now why do you think that this would address the other criticisms of such 
> a table of contents? How would it remove (i) the need for scrolling through 
> sections to find an answer; (ii) give an easy list of all the questions in a 
> bulleted-style selection.
> 
> Whatever you might say, smaller headings does not remove any of those two 
> points, so you might well go on suggesting that smaller headings (instead of 
> fully phrased questions) solves one problem, but it doesn't solve the others. 

Ok, we talked over each other for some time on this thread, so I have
adopted the policy that actions are easier to understand than words, and
have updated the page with what I have been trying to explain.

Ultimately, I think we should completely remove the Question & Answer
format on this page, the Heading & Explanation format works much better
in my opinion.

Feedback welcome.

Matt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEu8U+tSaF0w5rBv8RAvWxAJ9ZvMD9xuoqprs8qON+Fu1MUL+3ZgCeP7g8
Xz15NbnkXX6QBWhERwgSVNU=
=ArLk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----