better wiki engine?

Karl Goetz karl at kgoetz.id.au
Thu Mar 6 00:49:01 UTC 2008


On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 14:27 +0100, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
> ffm pisze:
> 
> >> There are other reasons too: the Moin software is used on a large
> >> number of different Ubuntu/Canonical related wikis, and the time and
> >> effort required for a transition of wiki software (preservation of
> >> pages, accounts, etc) would be ridiculous.
> > 
> > 
> > It seems like it would be pretty easy<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MoinMoin>
> 
> O RLY?
> "There are a number of hacky scripts for this. They are all defective in 
> various ways" (quote from above site)

I have to agree with not moving.
If the migration scripts from moinmoin are as bad as the ones for
phpwiki, its simply not worth the time to update it without a
*stunningly* good set of reasons.

IMO mediawikis only feature over the existing moinmoin is editing
sections.
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz <karl at kgoetz.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20080306/6c744da7/attachment.pgp>


More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list