Transition to Mallard?

Matthew East mdke at ubuntu.com
Wed Jan 20 18:21:25 UTC 2010


Hi,

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Kyle Nitzsche
<kyle.nitzsche at canonical.com> wrote:
> Practically speaking, yelp is the only option for ubuntu-docs now though.
> That doesn't mean it should always be so. Switching source content to
> Mallard feels like a step towards linking source format to a single display
> application, and on these grounds, I think it should only be done after
> proof that Mallard > HTML/XHTML/? transforms work for sure and after all
> other aspects are seriously considered and resolved (translations,
> packaging, etc.)

I do agree with you. As to transforms, we have the example that
projectmallard.org is HTML which is built from Mallard. We also know
that yelp itself has a Mallard -> HTML transformation toolchain.

As per my previous email, it's the translation and packaging points
that I'm most concerned about. I don't think it hurts to give this a
shot and play around with it in a separate branch / PPA. We don't have
to ship it if we find that it causes problems.

-- 
Matthew East
http://www.mdke.org
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF




More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list