server guide merge proposal

Tom Davies tomdavies04 at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Aug 16 19:04:51 UTC 2011


Hi :)
I just wondered how well this is going so far?  Has Ahmed been accepted as the 
new official person for the server-guide?  Just curious, sorry if it seems rude 
i was really just wondering.
Regards from
Tom :)




________________________________
From: Ahmed Kamal <kim0 at ubuntu.com>
To: Connor Imes <rocket2dmn at ubuntu.com>
Cc: ubuntu-doc <ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com>
Sent: Tue, 16 August, 2011 13:05:01
Subject: Re: server guide merge proposal

On 08/16/2011 01:33 AM, Connor Imes wrote: 

>
>On 08/12/2011 08:08 PM, Ahmed Kamal wrote: 
>On 08/12/2011 10:15 PM, Matthew East wrote: 
>>Hi Ahmed,
>>>
>>>On 12 August 2011 17:52, Ahmed Kamal <kim0 at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi again folks, Can someone please take a look at this merge proposal.
>>>>Please let me know if I'm missing any step. Thanks
>>>>
>>I'm afraid that merges or patches are not always (or even often)
>>reviewed straight away - all our members are volunteers and can only
>>contribute periodically so you will need to be patient. One other way
>>of making sure it isn't missed is to file a bug and attach it.
>>
>>We usually leave serverguide patches to Adam Sommer to review as he is
>>the maintainer, and pretty much sole contributor, to the serverguide
>>over recent release cycles. If he isn't around then we can take a look
>>at this. We get emails from merge proposals and it won't get missed.
>>
>>If you are interested in becoming a regular contributor, then it is
>>likely that after a number of patches have been contributed and
>>reviewed you can be offered membership of ~ubuntu-core-doc and the
>>ability to commit changes directly.
>>
>>
Thanks for your reply Matthew. Adam Sommer has stepped down from         
maintaining the server docs ( 
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.server/page=0)
>Which is why, this cycle I will be spending some cycles         maintaining the 
>server guide. I plan to actively review all         chapters ensuring all 
>outdated information is fixed, as well as         adding some documentation for 
>new developments such as Orchestra         provisioning, Ensemble and Ubuntu 
>Cloud. I'm an Ubuntu member         and I'm maintaining the Ubuntu cloud portal 
>(cloud.ubuntu.com),         so I'm familiar with many of these technologies. I 
>wish to get         at least this first merge reviewed fairly quickly, to avoid         
>crunching on many chapters only to discover that I should be         doing this 
>in a completely different way. Finally, since Adam         stepped down, I hope 
>someone else can review and merge this         proposal
>
>Thanks a lot, cheers
>
Hi Ahmed,

I reviewed your merge request and requested a quick validation       fix.  Once 
this is ready, I or another committer can complete the       merge.

Cheers,
-Connor

Thanks a lot! I just pushed the fix. I am now also more confident to     
progress to further chapter.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20110816/c1f586a5/attachment.html>


More information about the ubuntu-doc mailing list