[oneiric] Where should we keep the serverguide?

[Adam Sommer]

I agree Matt, my thinking about giving the Server Team access was so that if
someone is found that can dedicate more time to the guide than I can, it
would be easier for them.  But after thinking about some more, that person
should also be part of the Doc Team to make sure things are well coordinated
as possible between the two teams.

I guess feel free to go ahead and make the changes, and once they're done we
should send a message to the Server Team mailing list.

Thanks Matt for working on this.

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Matthew East <mdke at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 2 May 2011 15:34, Adam Sommer <asommer70 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > I think moving the Server Guide into it's own branch is a good idea as
> well.
> >  However, I'm not sure how exactly to go about making the move?
>
> I'm happy to take care of it.
>
> > It may make
> > more sense to move the docs under the Server Team and give them rights to
> > commit, or at least a subset of them commit access.
>
> Personally I would like to see the documentation team retain control
> over the serverguide branch, on the basis that this is the team with
> knowledge about technical writing and docbook with overall
> responsibility for documentation. It would be very easy for the server
> team to get the branch and send merge proposals as they are very
> familiar with bzr etc. However let's see what the server team thinks
> about this - either at UDS or by starting a dialogue with them.
>
> --
> Matthew East
> http://www.mdke.org
> gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
>



-- 
Party On,
Adam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20110502/be56c960/attachment.html>