Suggestion

[Jonathan Aquilina]

maybe so but it will give users a heads up hey maybe the doc team should be
informed this page doesnt support the release that i am on


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Tom Davies <tomdavies04 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi :)
> I think we need to be wary of that sort of thing.  It can make a page
> appear outdated even if it's contents are still valid and just means people
> have to take care to edit every single page even if it's only for that 1
> thing.
>
> It has always been my worry that it's the only reason some of our current
> pages have a bad reputation for being old.  The advice might still be solid
> but the version numbers are so out of date that the page is in danger of
> getting deleted and the wisdom or cunning lost.  Since the move to Unity
> that has been a lot less of an issue and i am beginning to agree it would
> be good to just wipe out a large number of pages, or at least stop them
> from being publicly accessible, but probably just deleting would be best.
>
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *From:* Jonathan Aquilina <eagles051387 at gmail.com>
> *To:* Ubuntu Doc <ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, 13 September 2013, 19:12
> *Subject:* Suggestion
>
> Is it possible to put on the page a list of versions that the steps to
> setup something applies to that way if and when somethign changes then we
> know that hey these documents need to be updated to include said stuff for
> this particular version.
>
> --
> Jonathan Aquilina
>
> --
> ubuntu-doc mailing list
> ubuntu-doc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc
>
>
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/attachments/20130913/5e6969bc/attachment-0001.html>