there's absolutely wrong statement regarding Solaris's zones and FreeBSD's jail in LXC doc:

[Igor Podlesny]

On 11 November 2014 11:11, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn at ubuntu.com> wrote:
[…]
> Igor, I'm not quite following.  You say the statement "containers are
> better compared to zones or jail" is wrong because zones and jails are
> very similar to containers.  But those are saying the same thing.
>
> Perhaps rephrasing your objection in the form of a patch would help to
> clarify?

1) "Containers are a lightweight virtualization technology."

   -- ok

2) "They are more akin to an enhanced chroot than to full
virtualization like Qemu
or VMware, both because they do not emulate hardware and because
containers share the same operating system as the host."

   -- ok

3) "Therefore containers are better compared to Solaris zones or BSD jails. ..."

   -- ORLY? How about zones and jails by themseves are "more like
chroot" and not "full virtualization".

   IOW, zones / jails / LXC are all the same approach, contrary to
"full virtualization".

--