1. Consistency of documentations - 2. Release specific documentation

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:12:15 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>Assuming parts of a Wiki could depend much on the Ubuntu release, would
>a wording similar to [1] be ok, or do you think it could
>cause uncertainty?  

>Some Ubuntu Studio meta-packages depend on other meta-packages, to
>install everything you likely could run:
>
>  sudo apt install ubuntustudio-desktop ubuntustudio-audio
> ubuntustudio-audio-plugins ubuntustudio-graphics ubuntustudio-video
>
>To install all the listed packages for 16.04 xenial without doubts run:
>
>  sudo apt install $(apt search ubuntustudio|cut -d/ -f1|grep -v
> transition|grep -Ev [[:upper:]])  

PS:

FWIW actually it's

  sudo apt install $(apt search ubuntustudio|cut -d/ -f1|grep -v
  [[:upper:]])

Assuming this should work for all Ubuntu releases, I still wonder if
it's not to obscure.

Listing the package names makes it more transparent, but might not work
for all Ubuntu releases.

Note, this is just an example, there are several similar issues on
other sites.