Call for comments on IRCC nominees

[Alan Pope]

Hi all,

2009/12/15 Elizabeth Krumbach <lyz at ubuntu.com>:
> The lack of a full active IRCC was causing serious problems
> community-wise (I fear poor jussi and Pici were being terribly
> over-worked, thanks again for all your hard work guys!). The consensus
> seemed to be that we should move forward with appointment and complete
> discussion on any final lingering issues once the new IRCC is in
> place.
>

I agree. I don't see changes to the IRCC as coming in the form of a
dictate from on high, but a collaboration between the CC, IRCC and
community. We've asked for and received feedback on the nominees, and
the charter. I believe the CC will work with the IRCC to mould the
charter into something workable. If there are potential flaws in it,
then we can look at that, nothing is set in stone.

> Any changes will be fully discussed with the new IRCC. Given that none
> of the changes appear to be too horribly controversial I don't see
> this as a major issue.
>

In addition to them being non-controversial, nobody other than Joseph
has raised these issues. Whilst that doesn't invalidate his claims,
equally seeing very few "me too's" from the existing or nominated IRCC
leaves me confident that it's not dummy-spittingly bad.

> I can't really claim to be speaking for the entire CC, but my dialog
> with this team has been in line with the consensus of the CC :)
>

I'm happy with the way Liz has communicated with the IRCC and other
contributors to this and other threads. I suspect if any members of
the CC felt inclined to disagree, we'd know.

Cheers,
Al.