#ubuntu-ops policy discussion

[Joseph Price]

On 1 February 2010 18:49, John Vivirito <gnomefreak at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2. Get a private, non-logged discussion channel for ops. You don't
>> need to publically log your 'private messages'. Nobody should expect
>> everything to be public. Get a channel people know exists.
>> Transparency only needs to go so far. Talk about stuff there when
>> advice etc is needed. Talk about currently happenning situations. Just
>> be prepared to (publically) justify any public actions you make based
>> on what is discussed there.. That's where we get transparency.
> I like this idea. i noticed we have 2. Is there an objection
> to use #ubuntu-irc for general/offtopic/non ops official
> channel. Use -ops to handle user problems and use -irc for non
> ops topics?

#something-ops is a recognised name. I'd suggest that be the 'open'
channel for general discussion. Its what people would expect.