Policy on extra-namespace trolling
Carl Karsten
carl at personnelware.com
Thu Apr 28 15:34:45 UTC 2011
Thanks.
I think the wording there is sufficient, so does it need to be duplicated?
This makes me think of sending patches to the upstream developers. :)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Lorenzo J. Lucchini <ljlbox at tiscali.it>wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2011 16:39:51 Carl Karsten wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Lorenzo J. Lucchini
> <ljlbox at tiscali.it>wrote:
> > > Freenode itself discourages such activities
> >
> > URL?
> >
> > I believe you; I would like to see how they worded it and what they do
> > about violations.
>
> I'd say the relevant policy sections are
>
> http://freenode.net/policy.shtml#offtopic ("In accordance with UK law
> freenode
> and the PDPC have no tolerance for any activity which could be construed as
> [...] or any other behaviour meant to deliberately bring upon a person
> harassment, alarm or distress")
>
> http://freenode.net/policy.shtml#topicalchannels ("These channels should
> not
> be used as platforms for flaming and trolling")
>
> The latter specifically refers to "##" channels; however it seems obvious
> that
> if such behaviors are not acceptable on them, they're even less so on
> primary "#" channels.
>
> I should probably point out that these policies have previously been
> enforced,
> perhaps in an even stricter way than the letter suggests.
>
> by LjL
> ljl at ubuntu.com
>
> --
> Ubuntu-irc mailing list
> Ubuntu-irc at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-irc
>
>
--
Carl K
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-irc/attachments/20110428/b79fc93b/attachment.html>
More information about the Ubuntu-irc
mailing list