[Ubuntu-l10n-eng] Could we all compile a GPG keyring for this group?

[Toby Smithe]

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 20:36 +0100, Ben Goodger wrote:
> On 01/09/06, Toby Smithe <toby.smithe at gmail.com> wrote:
>         On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 14:03 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote:
>         > There's always KMail!
>         > </happy KDE user>
>         
>         Well; I don't really want to add more kdelibs bloat to this
>         mainly GNOME
>         system. Sorry, KDE!
> 
> It really annoys me when people mention KDE or GNOME. It annoys me
> even more when people reciprocate, starting a flamewar.
> All KDE/GNOME/crap comments, please stop now. 

Woah! Sorry! But there is some truth in that running programs that use
libraries not already in memory is bound to take
a) time to load from the slow HD, and
b) up precious space in RAM.

I was not starting a flame war; just explaining my reason not to use
KMail. If I were running KDE, which is a matter purely of personal
opinion, then I would be more than happy to; and would also choose not
to install GNOME programs if I didn't have to for the same resons as
above.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-l10n-eng/attachments/20060901/145d2812/attachment.pgp