MOTU Decision Making Process

[Morten Kjeldgaard]

Excellent proposal!

> 2.  MOTU discuss on the ML.


> 5.  More discussion on the ML the selected person tries to guage  
> the rough
> consensus of the group.

Personally, I find it difficult to gauge concensus from a ML debate,  
especially if it's heated. Often, such a discussion tends to  
dissipate into several non-intersecting subdiscussions between a few  
very active participants, and the sense of the greater proportions is  
often lost. In addition, the outcome of such a discussion is also  
often dominated by the most persistent debater.

I have no practical idea how to do this better, perhaps a blogging  
tool like Digg or Ubuntu brainstorm, where comments can be voted "up"  
or down, would let the rough concensus percolate through, but I have  
no knowledge of any such tool being available.

Cheers,
Morten

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/attachments/20080617/1bda37f1/attachment.pgp