[Bug 2117280] Re: [SRU] Asymmetric routing issue on amphorae in ACTIVE_STANDBY topology
Nick Rosbrook
2117280 at bugs.launchpad.net
Wed Sep 3 12:37:08 UTC 2025
Hi,
A couple requests to help inform the SRU review.
1. Please add the "Where problems could occur" section, as described in the SRU template [1].
2. Please clarify the status of this bug in questing, plucky, and noble. I see in your description that this was fixed "after Yoga but before Zed", but I don't know how to map that to Ubuntu releases. And, it's not trivial to confirm this is fixed in e.g. Noble, because your patch appears to be a custom backport.
[1] https://documentation.ubuntu.com/sru/en/latest/reference/bug-
template/#reference-sru-bug-template
** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Also affects: octavia (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: octavia (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu Plucky)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: octavia (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
OpenStack, which is subscribed to Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2117280
Title:
[SRU] Asymmetric routing issue on amphorae in ACTIVE_STANDBY topology
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive:
New
Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive yoga series:
New
Status in octavia:
New
Status in octavia package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in octavia source package in Jammy:
Incomplete
Status in octavia source package in Noble:
Incomplete
Status in octavia source package in Plucky:
Incomplete
Bug description:
[Description] (SRU template below)
There is an asymmetric routing issue present when creating Octavia
amphorae (loadbalancer appliances/VMs) in ACTIVE_STANDBY topology on
Yoga. The setup is as follows:
- There are two private networks: network1 with subnet1 and network2 with subnet2, which are connected by an L3 router
- The loadbalancer has an interface on each network.
- The loadbalancer has a virtual ip (VIP) on network1. This is the intended address for ingress traffic, which (via keepalived) floats between MASTER and BACKUP upon failover
- The member VM is on network2. This is the ultimate target machine for incident requests on the VIP.
The expectation is that, bar security group restrictions, any machine
that can reach the VIP should be able to access the target machine
since the amphora will reverse proxy traffic to the member VM.
Connections on network1 to the VIP work as expected, however, in
practice we observe that requests originating on network2 to the VIP
do not route correctly.
To contextualize the following content, in my environment the subnet1
(vip subnet) cidr has the form 192.168.21.0/24 cidr while subnet2
(member subnet) is 172.16.0.0/24. If we look at the amphora-haproxy
namespace in the amphora we see the following ip rules:
$ sudo ip netns exec amphora-haproxy ip rule
0: from all lookup local
100: from 192.168.21.155 lookup 1 proto keepalived # from VIP
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
This means when the amphora is using it's VIP as its src ip, it will reference table 1 for routing. Inspecting the available routes,
$ sudo ip netns exec amphora-haproxy ip route show table 1
192.168.21.0/24 dev eth1 proto keepalived scope link src 192.168.21.155
There is only a route to the 192.168.21.0/24 subnet (vip subnet), on
which it will use the vip address as the source address. What this
means is that there is no route to the 172.16.0.0/24 subnet (target
subnet) or another subnet. Essentially if the client vm is on any
subnet that isn't the vip subnet the return path is broken
This is not a problem in the ACTIVE or ACTIVE_ACTIVE topologies. The
reason is that those are not maintained by keepalived and instead have
default routes programmed into the amphora's table 1 at [1]. Note the
if topology != consts.TOPOLOGY_ACTIVE_STANDBY predicate, which is
indicative of the different way in which ACTIVE_STANDBY is managed.
ACTIVE_STANDBY is instead configured by the vrrp driver populating the
keepalived template at [2]. Unlike the other topologies, in the
keepalived template there is no programmed default route in table 1.
This was fixed in [3], which merged after Yoga but before Zed. This
commit contains feature implementations and small schema changes and
as such I'm not suggesting we SRU this change, but simply mentioning
it for the context of affected versions. Instead, I have prepared a
minimal patch that simply adds the default route to the template
[1] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/tree/octavia/amphorae/backends/utils/interface_file.py?h=applied/ubuntu/jammy-updates&id=65552cbabcfc7f230bc66fccfac7019d409409b5#n135
[2] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/tree/octavia/amphorae/drivers/keepalived/jinja/templates/keepalived_base.template?h=applied/ubuntu/jammy-updates&id=65552cbabcfc7f230bc66fccfac7019d409409b5 Note that
[3] https://github.com/openstack/octavia/commit/d9ee63f561019c247a49de5805b6d9dcbafeeadf
[Impact]
- Amphorae in ACTIVE_STANDBY topology exhibit an asymmetric routing
issue that prevents traffic from passing as expected.
- As a result of the above, the target and client VMs cannot be on a
different subnet than the vip
- More flexible and complicated networking implementations are not
possible
[Test Plan]
- Run the following steps without using the patched octavia
1. Deploy OpenStack with Octavia using any method you would like (via
juju, devstack, kolla-ansible, or manually/custom) and ensure that
when configuring Octavia, the load-balancer topology is set to
ACTIVE_STANDBY. As there are many ways to deploy OpenStack, each with
their own nuances, and unique steps, I don't think it's practical to
elaborate and will leave it up to the user to choose their method for
this step. Generally, the recommendation is to follow the upstream
deployment guide for whichever platform you're using. I will be using
juju. To set the topology in juju, run:
juju config octavia loadbalancer-topology=ACTIVE_STANDBY
2. Once the openstack services are up and the environment is ready,
authorize the openstack command line client to the desired scope by
sourcing the credentials any way you would like (via a .creds-rc file,
setting the OS_CLOUD environment variable, etc.).
3. Once authorized to the desired scope (user and project), create the
network as described in the [Description] section:
openstack network create net1 # This is the VIP subnet
openstack subnet create subnet1 \
--network net1 \
--subnet-range 192.168.21.0/24 \
--gateway 192.168.21.1 \
--dns-nameserver 8.8.8.8
openstack network create net2 # This is the subnet for the ultimate
target machine
openstack subnet create subnet2 \
--network net2 \
--subnet-range 172.16.0.0/24 \
--gateway 172.16.0.1 \
--dns-nameserver 8.8.8.8
- Create a router and attach it to the two subnets
openstack router create router1
openstack router add subnet router1 subnet1
openstack router add subnet router1 subnet2
4. Create a machine on each subnet. Note that this assumes you have
uploaded a cirros image to glance called cirros-0.4.0, have created a
flavor called m1.tiny, and that the default security group allows SSH
(TCP on port 22) from anywhere (0.0.0.0/0)
openstack server create --flavor m1.tiny --image cirros-0.4.0 --net net1 server1 # This machine will act as a client on the VIP network
openstack server create --flavor m1.tiny --image cirros-0.4.0 --net net2 server2 # This machine will act as the destination of the loadbalancer
5. Create an amphora-based loadbalancer. This assumes you have created
an amphora image, either manually, with octavia's diskimage-create.sh
tool, or using the disk-image-retrofit snap, and that it has been
properly uploaded to glance with the octavia-amphora image tag. We're
going to use the LB to reverse proxy all ssh traffic to the target
machine to test connectivity
openstack loadbalancer create --name lb --vip-network-id net1 --wait
openstack loadbalancer pool create --name pool --protocol TCP --loadbalancer lb --lb-algorithm ROUND_ROBIN --wait
export SERVER2_IP=$(openstack server show server2 --format json --column addresses | jq --raw-output '.addresses.net2[]')
openstack loadbalancer member create --name server2 --subnet-id subnet2 --address ${SERVER2_IP} --protocol-port 22 pool --wait
openstack loadbalancer listener create lb --protocol TCP --protocol-port 22 --name listener --default-pool pool --wait
At this point, the environment is configured and we should have two
amphorae, which can be checked via
openstack loadbalancer amphora list
6. Now we need to start test whether or not machines can reach the
target machine through the amphora VIP. Open up a session in the
compute hypervisor with the needed environment variables (network
uuids, and machine ips)
juju ssh nova-compute/0 "export NET1_UUID=$(openstack network show
net1 -f json | jq --raw-output .id); export NET2_UUID=$(openstack
network show net2 -f json | jq --raw-output .id); export
SERVER1_IP=$(openstack server show server1 --format json --column
addresses | jq --raw-output '.addresses.net1[]'); export
SERVER2_IP=$(openstack server show server2 --format json --column
addresses | jq --raw-output '.addresses.net2[]'); export
VIP_IP=$(openstack loadbalancer list -f json | jq --raw-output
.[].vip_address); bash -l"
- Connect to the machine on the VIP subnet
sudo ip netns exec ovnmeta-$NET1_UUID ssh cirros@$SERVER1_IP "export
VIP_IP=$VIP_IP; sh -l"
- ssh to the target via the VIP
ssh cirros@$VIP_IP # This works successfully
- Exit back to the juju machine (nova hypervisor) and connect to the target machine
sudo ip netns exec ovnmeta-$NET2_UUID ssh cirros@$SERVER2_IP "export VIP_IP=$VIP_IP; sh -l"
7. Try to ssh into itself through the VIP_IP. Note that if you want,
instead of ssh-ing to itself, you could create a third server on net2
and validate that ssh-ing to the target machine from there through the
VIP is also broken
ssh cirros@$VIP_IP # This does not work, the command hangs.
- Exit back to the machine with the openstack and juju clients
8. Optionally, you can check that the amphora doesn't have the default
route by copying the amphora ssh key to the octavia unit (which has
the octavia-lb-mgmt network namespace), ssh-ing into the MASTER
amphora, and running sudo ip netns exec amphora-haproxy ip route show
table 1.
9. Upgrade all octavia units to -proposed package and restart all
octavia-* services if they do not automatically do so
10. Fortunately, because the vrrp driver and keepalived template are
uploaded by the octavia-worker.service to the amphora, we do not need
to rebuild the amphora image. All we need to do is failover the
loadbalancer so that the old amphora master instance is deleted and
the unit that replaces it receives the updated template.
openstack loadbalancer failover lb
11. Repeat 6 and 7 verifying that ssh works from both subnets
12. Optionally, repeat 8 but observe that now table 1 contains a
default route
[Other Info]
- Fortunately, the configuration of amphorae in ACTIVE_STANDBY is done
by the octavia-worker service which runs the vrrp driver that
populates the keepalived template and then uploads the resultant
configuration to a flask server hosted by the amphorae, which digests
the file, writes the contents to its own filesystem, and starts the
keepalived service. What this means is that amphorae images need not
be rebuilt to contain the changes. Simply upgrading the machines
running the octavia-worker service is sufficient. It also means that
failing over an existing amphora results in the new amphora obtaining
the route since the unit that is running octavia has been updated with
the new template.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/2117280/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-openstack-bugs
mailing list