[Ubuntu-PH] Arguments agains persecution by Microsoft-centric office

[Franz Allan Valencia See]

True.

The burden of proof is on them not yours.

If it is a known problem that Ubuntu kills a Dell Latitude C840
laptop's LCD, then it is safe to assume that Ubuntu did cause the
problem.

But it is not.

Why should you prove to them that Ubuntu did not cause the problem?
They should be the one proving that Ubuntu did cause it.

On 11/23/06, Irvin Piraman <ippiraman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/24/06, Barbon Wilson John <wjbarbon at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear fellow Ubunteros,
> >
> > I have been using Ubuntu for more than a year now and its only that I am
> being persecuted by the office for damaging the office-issued laptop because
> I run ubuntu in it.
> >
> > Its a Dell Latitude C840 laptop and the problem is that the LCD went dead,
> on power up it turns to washed out white screen. It has the same issue also
> when its running in Windows. Then they send to Dell for repair and now its
> happen again. The office refused to send to Dell service center again
> because according to them I damaged it because I am using Ubuntu and not
> Windows.
>
> What a lousy argument!
>
> If I were you I'd ask for proof how did they come up with such a stupid
> conclusion. This is a typical mindset of people who are close-minded and
> VERY resistant to change. And in my experience, it is futile arguing with
> such a person. But that's just me.
>
> Good luck ;)
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-ph mailing list
> ubuntu-ph at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-ph
>
>
>