Ubuntu and its community
Ramón Rocha
ra.rocha.jr at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 22:52:17 UTC 2011
>
> I don't agree. Limiting options that are desired is not a way to appeal
> to a larger audience. If Honda decided to remove the additional option
> of retractable windows to limit complexity, they would surely see a
> decrease in sales.
Well, removing features and limiting options are not always the same thing.
Should Honda spend extra resources to accommodate a portion of drivers that
want their windows to rotate down instead of sliding down but still make it
possible to simply slide down? Maybe but let's not take this analogy too
far as it's already starting to break down :)
My point is: Most of the issues with Unity come from its inherit design and
not necessarily its lack of configurable options. I mean, do we even know
what would be good to tweak at this point? Ideally, usability issues should
not be fixed with a power-user tool. They should be fixed in the design.
-Ramón
P.S. Apologies for top-posting my last reply.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-power-users/attachments/20110624/5f20fc2f/attachment.html>
More information about the Ubuntu-power-users
mailing list