Let's start off on the right foot, let's fix simple-ccsm.

Jorge O. Castro jorge at ubuntu.com
Thu May 19 16:43:22 UTC 2011


On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:29 AM, James Tait <james.tait at wyrddreams.org> wrote:
> Just a thought - do we want to maintain this as a patchset against
> upstream or fork it and make it specific to Unity?  I guess there are
> pros and cons to either approach.

The interested party would have to post to the upstream mailing list
and talk to them about which approach would be best.

As far as the other tools go, the best thing we can do is reach out to
the authors of gunity and confity and see if they'll join this list so
we can debate the technical merits of each approach. (I only mention
simple-ccsm because we've been shipping it for a while already).

Regardless of what path we take, having one good tool is probably
better than having 3 unfinished tools.



More information about the Ubuntu-power-users mailing list