Bugs without a package

[Brian Murray]

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 03:40:35PM -0700, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Brian Murray <brian at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Recently there has been some fantastic progress made with the pile of
> > bugs without a package, however the numbers are starting to creep back
> > up.  While working with the xorg.conf python-launchpad-bugs validation
> > script it occurred to me that it would be interesting to see how many
> > bugs without a package have an attachment - about 430.  It seems to me
> > that this might be another way to slice up the large pile.  I'm curious
> > about the best way of identifying these no package bugs with
> > attachments.
> >
> > 1) Setup another bug report identifying bug numbers and their
> > attachments.
> >
> > 2) Tag all the bugs as 'has-attachment' or so.
> >
> > I prefer 2 since this will then be searchable in Launchpad via the
> > 'has-attachment' tag, which actually it should just be possible to
> > search for bugs with attachments.
> >
> > Does anybody have any thoughts about the best way to move forward?
> 
> This may be a stupid question, but if you're gonna spend the time to
> tag them, why not go ahead and figure out a package to assign the bug
> to and get them off the list permanently?

I really wasn't going to spend the time to tag them, my friend
python-launchpad-bugs was.
 
-- 
Brian Murray                                                 @ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20080910/78fc2deb/attachment.pgp>