QA meeting summary -- 2010-09-01

[C de-Avillez]

On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:09:00 -0400
Scott Kitterman <ubuntu at kitterman.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 04:44:42 pm C de-Avillez wrote:
> > Additionally we briefly discussed changes to the regression-* tags
> > usage: it seems the current workflow is a bit confusing, and we
> > would like to simplify it by abandoning usage of
> > 'regression-potential' (used for potential/confirmed regressions on
> > the Ubuntu release currently in development); instead we would use
> > 'regression-release <codename of Ubuntu dev release>'. If a
> > regression is confirmed, then a nomination to the affected Ubuntu
> > release is done. Note that nominations are already used for this.
> > 
> > We would like feedback & suggestions about this potential change;
> > we feel this simple change will streamline the process, and make
> > these bugs palatable for triagers. 
> 
> This should be discussed on ubuntu-devel too.  It doesn't just
> affect QA and triage.

Yes, of course. We, during the meeting, explicitly stated we would
contact -devel. It just happened I forgot to state it here (but it is
in the minutes). Sorry for this.

..C..
-- 
C de-Avillez
IRC: hggdh

This email (and any attachments) is digitally signed using GNUpg
(http://gnupg.org). The public key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu.
The key Id is 0xD3133E56.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20100902/cf361f0e/attachment.pgp>