Upgrading to 16.04 can render the system permanently broken

Brian Murray brian at ubuntu.com
Tue Apr 26 16:01:33 UTC 2016


On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0100, flocculant at gmx.co.uk wrote:
> On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
> >Flocculant:
> >>Is this why you have never responded to Xubuntu bugs?
> >
> >Yes, as I informed Pasi Lallinaho.
> >
> >
> >Flocculant:
> >> We track bug status - and as the Hundred status never changes this
> >> causes us problems.
> >
> >Setting importance is not because the Papercuts project, but for debugging
> >Ubuntu itself.
> >
> >As spoke to Pasi, the reason why you disagree on my setting is because you
> >disagree with (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Importance) in the first
> >place. Setting cosmetic bugs as they have high importance, the same as if
> >the application did not worked at all.
> >
> >
> No.
> 
> This is not about bug importance at all.
> 
> That is a different issue.
> 
> What I am saying is that adding HundredPaperCuts - then that never changing
> - mucks up our bug tracking.

Could you elaborate on how having a task for a project that isn't Ubuntu
affects your ability to track the bug?

Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-quality/attachments/20160426/84c25b98/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the Ubuntu-quality mailing list