Ubuntu Font Testing

chris hermansen clhermansen at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 18:29:23 UTC 2016


Ah OK, so to be 100% clear, is it worth checking this font out in Wily or
only in its default configuration in Xenial?

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com> wrote:

> Blargh! It's Xenial. Only in Xenial. Wow, and no one else noticed this for
> 2 days. I'm sorry. LOL, notice my source link below?
>
>
> Nicholas
>
> On 01/06/2016 12:06 PM, chris hermansen wrote:
>
>> Nicholas, I just ran today's updates (mostly ffmpeg in my case).  I have
>> checked the updates settings: all "install updates from" boxes checked,
>> updates checked daily, display immediately for both security and other
>> updates.
>>
>> The strange little glyph still shows as 0.830 in both the gmail window
>> and with pango-view.
>>
>> Checking synaptic, I have ttf-ubuntu-font-family installed.  I searched
>> for other packages with the terms "font ubuntu" and "font release" but
>> nothing obvious there.
>>
>> I checked the Ubuntu font with the font viewer application and it's still
>> reported as 0.83.
>>
>> I checked my .fonts directory and there are no ubuntu-related fonts
>> there.  Nothing in /usr/local/share/fonts.
>>
>> In /usr/share/fonts/ubuntu-font-family, all the .ttf files are dated 10
>> Jul 2015 except the UbuntuMono files which are dated 26 Sep 2011.
>>
>> I don't see anything in /usr/share/fonts that looks as though it could be
>> a new release of ubuntu fonts.
>>
>> I should mention that this machine is upgraded from 15.04 (ie not a fresh
>> install), in case that matters.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Nicholas Skaggs <
>> nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Chris, that's correct. You should have 0.84, which is the new
>>     version. Are you running an up to date Wily?
>>
>>
>>     Checkout
>>
>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+source/ubuntu-font-family-sources
>>
>>     Nicholas
>>
>>     On 01/05/2016 05:23 PM, chris hermansen wrote:
>>
>>         Nicholas,
>>
>>         What I see when I execute this:
>>
>>         pango-view --font="Ubuntu 48" --markup --text='<span
>>         fallback="false"> The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy
>>         dog.</span>'
>>
>>         is (all on one line):
>>
>>          1. 0.830 in very small text
>>          2. something that looks like 88 on a 7-segment display
>>          3. a space
>>          4. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
>>
>>         So just to be super-clear, I don't see a ".84" in that
>>         string.  I also don't see it in the text of this e-mail; what
>>         I see looks a single glyph whose strokes make 0.830 in very
>>         small letters.
>>
>>         I had an inspiration and checked with my font view
>>         application.  It tells me my Ubuntu font is:
>>
>>         Name: Ubuntu
>>
>>         Style: Regular
>>
>>         Type: TrueType font
>>
>>         Version: 0.83
>>
>>         Copyright: Copyright 2011 Canonical Ltd. Licensed under the
>>         Ubuntu Font License 1.0
>>
>>         Does this mean I don't have the new version?
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
>>         <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>             Chris, ahh. Yea, the new version is .84, and you can
>>         confirm you
>>             have it by seeing 0.84 in the beginning:
>>
>>             pango-view --font="Ubuntu 48" --markup --text='<span
>>             fallback="false"> The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy
>>             dog.</span>'
>>
>>             The other font you don't have. I removed it from the
>>         directions.
>>             It's from when we did the PPA testing. Thanks for catching
>>         this!
>>
>>             Nicholas
>>
>>             On 01/05/2016 03:40 PM, chris hermansen wrote:
>>
>>                 Nicholas, a further question if I may:
>>
>>                 I am running 100% up to date Wily.
>>
>>                 When, as per the instructions, I execute:
>>
>>                 pango-view --font="UbuntuPrerelease0910 48" --markup
>>                 --text='<span fallback="false"> The quick brown fox
>>         jumps
>>                 over the lazy dog.</span>'
>>
>>                 I see what appears to be exactly the same display as
>>         when I
>>                 execute
>>
>>                 pango-view --font="Deja Vu 48" --markup --text='<span
>>                 fallback="false"> The quick brown fox jumps over the
>>         lazy
>>                 dog.</span>'
>>
>>                 That is, the text looks to be rendered in exactly the same
>>                 font: same glyphs, same size, everything.  And pretty
>>         clearly
>>                 different from plain old Ubuntu.
>>
>>                 Any ideas?  Is UbuntuPrerelease0910 not really
>>         installed in my
>>                 Wily and somehow I'm getting Deja Vu instead? Should I be
>>                 asking this question somewhere else?
>>
>>
>>                 On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Nicholas Skaggs
>>                 <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>>                 <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>
>>                 <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>>                 <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>>> wrote:
>>
>>                     Yea, crazy crazy link. I send in plain text, so I
>>         didn't think
>>                     about it. The link has spaces in it.
>>
>>                     Let me just end the madness by fixing the wiki:
>>
>>         https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFontFamily/Testing
>>
>>                     Nicholas
>>
>>
>>                     On 01/05/2016 03:08 PM, chris hermansen wrote:
>>
>>                         Nicolas, that link redirected me to
>>         https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Home?action=show&redirect=Ubuntu
>>
>>
>>
>>                         On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Nicholas Skaggs
>>                         <nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>>                 <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>
>>                         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>>                 <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>>
>>                         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>>                 <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>
>>                         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>
>>                 <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com
>>         <mailto:nicholas.skaggs at canonical.com>>>>> wrote:
>>
>>                             Some of you have been at this already, but
>>         either way,
>>                         please have
>>                             a look at the new Ubuntu Font if you are
>>         running
>>                 Wily. It
>>                         has some
>>                             fixes in it, specifically we need to
>>         verify 4 bugs
>>                 + the
>>                         Arabic
>>                             and Hebrew fixes. Full details can be
>>         found here:
>>         https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Ubuntu Font Family/Testing
>>
>>                             Happy Testing!
>>
>>                             Nicholas
>>
>>                             --     Ubuntu-quality mailing list
>>         Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>                 <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>>
>>                         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>                 <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>>>
>>                             <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>                 <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>>
>>                         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>                 <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com
>>         <mailto:Ubuntu-quality at lists.ubuntu.com>>>>
>>                             Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                         --         Chris Hermansen · clhermansen "at"
>>         gmail
>>                 "dot" com
>>
>>                         C'est ma façon de parler.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                 --         Chris Hermansen · clhermansen "at" gmail
>>         "dot" com
>>
>>                 C'est ma façon de parler.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         --         Chris Hermansen · clhermansen "at" gmail "dot" com
>>
>>         C'est ma façon de parler.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Hermansen · clhermansen "at" gmail "dot" com
>>
>> C'est ma façon de parler.
>>
>
>


-- 
Chris Hermansen · clhermansen "at" gmail "dot" com

C'est ma façon de parler.


More information about the Ubuntu-quality mailing list