S Release Schedule

[Pete Graner]

Hello,

I updated the "S" schedule [1]. The schedule is typical and looks very
similar to what we did for 12.10 date wise. I added the 3 opt-in
Alphas and 1 opt-in Beta for the flavors that wish to participate.
Additionally I added in the next vUDS as well.

If there are any questions or concerns let me know.

Thanks

~pete

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule


--
Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager - <pgraner at canonical.com>
Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Pete Graner <pete.graner at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Adam Conrad <adconrad at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:46:36PM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>>>
>>> I just had a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SReleaseSchedule and it
>>> seems like the relevant parts of it were written in September 2011.
>>
>> Right, this was pretty much just a template carried forward, I should
>> go fill it in with approximate dates based on what we've done for
>> raring (which should come close to the truth), and we can polish it
>> later if we decide to refine things.
>>
>> (In light of that, if you need dates before I go edit the wiki, you
>> can just use raring's schedule and add ~6mo, or so)
>>
>> ... Adam
>>
>
> Its on my TODO for this week. As Adam said the current S schedule is
> just a template. I had been waiting on the Tech Board decision [1] on
> the release process which happened on Monday, before putting the work
> into a new schedule. I'll have it done by EOW.
>
> [1] http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/03/19/ubuntu-technical-board-looks-at-shuttleworths-proposal-for-release-management-methodology/
>
> Thanks
>
> ~pete
>
> --
> Pete Graner - Release Engineering & QA Team Manager - <pgraner at canonical.com>
> Canonical Ltd. - http://www.canonical.com/