libffi libnettle transitions request

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> To enable control flow protection (Intel CET) we need to kick of ABI
> transition for libffi and libnettle, because trampolines / shadow
> stack changes there change abi along with other changes that happened.

> libffi transition means rebuild of ruby python php haskell
> llvm-toolchains guile....

> I guess we should have opened with libffi transition, but oh well.

> Is it ok to proceed with libffi transition? It will be disruptive, due
> to rebuilds triggering autopkgtests of all languages with bindings
> effectively.

And there's already a libnettle transition ongoing in -proposed.  Is that
this one, or is it an unrelated one we should dump?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/attachments/20200630/39e2d99a/attachment.sig>