[Bug 1466608] Re: Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies

[Thomas Hood]

Hi. I don't see how resolvconf could be responsible for this problem.
Initial observation: it seems that dig gets the correct answer from
dnsmasq when it supplies the additional option udp:1280, but the glibc
resolver doesn't get the right answer from dnsmasq when it fails to
supply that option. Reassigning to dnsmasq.

** Package changed: resolvconf (Ubuntu) => dnsmasq (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466608

Title:
  Unable to resolve domains with large EDNS0 replies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1466608/+subscriptions