[Bug 1267393] Re: [MIR] juju-core, juju-mongodb, gccgo, golang
Steve Langasek
steve.langasek at canonical.com
Wed Oct 14 05:17:53 UTC 2015
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:33:37PM -0000, Michael Terry wrote:
> Though in this respect, golang isn't so different than C libraries, where
> an unexpected API update or library bug can cause ftbfs in
> reverse-depends.
It is different, because:
- reverse-dependencies don't have to be rebuilt for a security update to a
C library; even if an API does break, C revdeps can be left unbuildable
for a while with much less impact
- since we're not using shared libraries (at this point), there's nothing
in the packaging of go packages (like sonames for C libraries) that
signals to proposed-migration that there's been an incompatible change
requiring a transition.
> But actually, I expected we could use Built-Using fields in our
> proposed-migration tooling to automatically test that reverse-depends
> could still build. Is that not in the works yet?
I'm not aware that anyone has discussed integrating such functionality into
proposed-migration.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to golang-github-bmizerany-pat in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267393
Title:
[MIR] juju-core, juju-mongodb, gccgo, golang
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-golang/+bug/1267393/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-server-bugs
mailing list