Are pacmaker/corosync ready for production systems with Lucid Server?

[carlopmart]

Ante Karamatić wrote:
> On 24.04.2010 18:45, Ante Karamatić wrote:
> 
>>>     Which cluster stack will be released with LTS support for Lucid server: pacemaker
>>> or redhat-cluster-suite??
>> RHCS is main, pacemaker is in universe.
> 
> Just a side note. LTS means that all packages in main will be supported 
> for a long term (by community and Canonical). That doesn't mean that 
> universe packages won't be. In this particular case (pacemaker) it's of 
> my (vital) interest to have it fully supported cause of my business 
> needs; therefor I'll devote my time to keep it in shape. Some companies 
> may find one software/tool/package business critical, others might not.
> 
> Look at ClamAV PPA for comparison.
> 
> 

Thanks Ante. But one question: packages released on PPA channel (in this case 
pacemaker and rhcs) have long term support or do I need to use main and universe repos?

Thanks.

-- 
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com