proposed universe demotion: virt-manager (or, a request for active maintenance)
Serge van Ginderachter
serge at vanginderachter.be
Sun Jan 31 19:29:31 UTC 2010
On 31 January 2010 04:43, Dustin Kirkland <kirkland at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Vishal Rao <vishalrao at gmail.com> wrote:
> > For a regular user who wants a UI frontend to operate KVM etc, what
> > are my options?
> > Right now I am quite forced to move to VirtualBox/VMware because I'm
> > too noobish to work with the command line.
>
> Let me reiterate ... I am not proposing that we drop it from the
> archive, but merely move it from Main to Universe.
>
> We use (and depend) on dozens of packages every day that are in
> Universe. You would not lose access to virt-manager, but rather the
> stated support for the package would actually line up with the reality
> I feel we currently have.
>From a pure user perspective, please allow me to explain my point of view,
as I view it. I'm prettu sure lot's of users see it in a similar way.
- Ubuntu/Canonical choose KVM as its main Virtualisation technology.
- KVM is gaining more and more attention, especially since Red Hat choose it
as its own main virtualisation solution.
- Ubuntu wants to be Linux for human beings, which amongst others - and imho
- means it needs to maintain a full stack of userland tools for its
solutions. I think a GUI application to KVM is a part of that.
- Canonical/Ubuntu internal discussions on how "server team" and "desktop
team" are separate entities which can't manage to agree on the full stack of
end user experience are not what I call "professional support". (Imho
virt-manager is part of the server offering, end of discussion.
- I understand that having software in Universe is for most users pretty
much the same as software in Main, but again, this is a very poor argument
in "entreprise environments". At some point bugs will arise which won't get
the needed attention because the soft is in Universe.
I do apologise in advance if my words seems a bit harsh, as this is
obviously not intended.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Serge van Ginderachter
Disclaimer: by sending an email to ANY of my addresses you are agreeing
that:
1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient"
2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit and make
such financial profit,
political mileage, or good joke as it lends itself to. In particular, I
may quote it on usenet.
3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your company.
4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality
that may be included on your message
"Clear your mind of 'can't.'." - Samuel Johnson
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/attachments/20100131/16799322/attachment.html>
More information about the ubuntu-server
mailing list