A bad experience ...
Sean Edwards
cybersean3000 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 5 14:05:14 GMT 2008
Ecasound, Audacity, arecord, aplay and sox are pretty much all I need for recording. I mostly use ecasound for recording, and Audacity for clean up and mastering.
-=cybersean=-
----- Original Message ----
From: Gustin Johnson <gustin at echostar.ca>
To: Ubuntu Studio Users Help and Discussion <ubuntu-studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
Sent: Monday, February 4, 2008 4:50:35 PM
Subject: Re: A bad experience ...
-----BEGIN
PGP
SIGNED
MESSAGE-----
Hash:
SHA1
Det
wrote:
|
@Larry
Lines
and
@Andrew
Hunter
|
|
Larry
Lines
wrote:
|>
My
first
question
would
be...
Why
Rosegarden?
I
would
never
think
|>
to
use
Rosegarden
for
live
recording.
I
keep
seeing
people
do
|>
this,
but
certainly
Ardour
would
be
my
first
choice.
A
lot
less
|>
overhead.
Maybe
I
am
wrong.
|
|
1.)
I
stumbled
over
Rosegarden
somewhere
in
the
past
and
it
then
was
|
the
pendant
to
Cubase,
which
I
knew
from
my
vintage
Atari.
So
it
was
|
a
natural
first
step
to
start
that
up.
Rosegarden
works
for
me.
I
have
a
16
channel
rig
(RME
9652
+
external
interfaces).
|
2.)
Why
*not*
Rosegarden?
It
seems
meant
for
that,
I
immediately
|
found
good
documentation
answering
my
questions
...?!
I
prefer
Ardour
for
these
tasks.
Having
come
from
the
Cubase
world
a
few
years
ago,
Ardour
best
suits
my
work
flow.
I
do
use
Rosegarden
for
midi
editing
and
composition.
But
the
audio
almost
always
gets
routed
to
Ardour.
I
have
both
apps
open
at
the
same
time,
doing
separate
tasks.
There
is
a
learning
curve,
but
once
you
wrap
your
head
around
the
basics,
the
payoff
will
be
immense.
As
an
aside,
I
have
been
using
Ardour
for
many
years,
and
I
still
learn
something
new
on
a
regular
basis.
This
is
true
for
Linux
Audio
in
general.
|
3.)
As
I
said,
I
*did*
recording
with
Rosegarden.
And
recording
some
|
synthe
waves
and
doing
multitrack
voice
recording
isn't
less
"live"
|
as
a
electric
guitar,
from
the
tool's
viewpoint,
is
it?
I
would
look
at
hard
drive
performance.
The
I/O
on
laptops
is
usually
significantly
slower
on
laptops.
You
may
also
need
to
tune
your
hard
drive
with
hdparm,
google
is
your
friend
here.
|
Nevertheless,
I
heard
of,
but
do
not
know
Ardour.
Seems
this
has
to
|
change
pronto.
I'll
see
how
the
machine
reacts
to
this.
(Beside
that
|
I
wonder
if
Michael
would
like
to
say
something...)
<snip>
|
I
already
saw
that
argument
too.
But
neither
did
I
claim
I'd
have
a
|
valid
test
scenario
for
comparision,
nor
did
I
imagine
my
machine
as
|
"inadequate"
(reg.
the
datasheet),
as
Jack
and
Rosegarden
wired
2
in
|
2
out
should
do
the
job
at
least
as
well
as
Jack,
Rosegarden,
|
ZynAddthing,
QSynth,
all
wired
together
midiwise
and
audiowise
(not
|
to
mention
my
sons
pc
being
standard,
not
"dedicated").
That
seems
to
|
have
been
an
illusion.
Linux
is
not
Windows.
It
is
not
a
valid
comparison.
Your
son
does
not
have
a
jack
equivalent
(and
yes
I
have
used
rewire
extensively,
it
is
still
not
in
the
same
ball
park).
You
would
likely
have
had
the
same
results
as
your
son
if
you
had
not
used
the
apps
you
did.
Audacity
works
fine
for
me
on
all
my
Linux
boxes.
It
is
sort
of
like
pulling
out
a
sword
that
you
don't
know
how
to
use,
then
whining
when
you
cut
yourself.
-----BEGIN
PGP
SIGNATURE-----
Version:
GnuPG
v1.4.5
(MingW32)
Comment:
Using
GnuPG
with
Mozilla
-
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHp5a7wRXgH3rKGfMRArluAJ9dtLXlen6eJlL4P4/gFbqzFZOGLwCghayj
t/DoDTjz2K3Qcp6zBNzXXvc=
=KjD+
-----END
PGP
SIGNATURE-----
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users
mailing
list
Ubuntu-Studio-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
settings
or
unsubscribe
at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20080205/d73de4ca/attachment.htm
More information about the Ubuntu-Studio-users
mailing list