[ubuntu-studio-users] Stand Up kde-full is Ok now, returning again to X11 + C++11 and looking for Sound focus Kernel Improvements collaboration.

[Erich Eickmeyer]

On Saturday, October 1, 2022 2:44:35 AM PDT Juan DCG wrote:
> I would like promote some maybe simple or maybe complex.
> 
> So,
> 
> Over 2013 I was building piece by piece, big workstation in amd64/ATX,
> nowdays is working by default KDE new envirnonment GUI with recently
> Deprecated XCFE.
> 
> Only apt install kde-full && reboot to work in Ubunu 22.
> 
> Satisfy my self.
> 
> But I'm looking for help to work and job, focusing only on Sound/Audio, as
> Bela.io, for example, with other RT Kernel than default low latency maybe
> no tolarated in professional Sound Environments or acoustics applied data
> science environments able to look ahead bechmarking.
> 
> Are there anyone interesting and be able to help me together to reach this
> objetives?
> 
> Regards,
> ---------
> 
> JuanDCG314...

Hi Juan,

You're already off to a rough start. First of all, Xfce is not deprecated. It's merely not 
the default. One can still use Xfce by using Xubuntu and using Ubuntu Studio 
Installer. This is covered via a link on the very front page of the website and via a 
download page, but here's a link for your reference: https://ubuntustudio.org/
ubuntu-studio-installer[1]

Secondly, we never refer to an Ubuntu (or Studio or any other flavor) merely by the 
year (you referred to it as simply 22) as this is highly imprecise. Later this month, 
22.10 (2022.October) will be released. The version number always refers to the date 
it was released, not an arbitrary number. I assume you're referring to the version 
released in 2022.April, or 22.04 as it's officially known. Please be more precise and 
refer to it by the YY.MM (Year.Month), not simply the year, as this will get confusing 
very quickly with two "22"s in the same year. Here's more about the release cycle: 
https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle[2]

Secondly, RT kernels in desktop computers are a very bad idea for security and 
power usage reasons and should only be implemented in embedded systems. Read 
this to see a an explanation as to why, and why Ubuntu Studio does NOT condone 
nor support RT kernels: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/
RealTimeKernel[3]

That said, there is already a safe RT kernel in the works with the new 
implementations done in the most recent kernel technologies internally at 
Canonical. I have not kept up on those conversations (as stated before privately to 
you, I do not work for Canonical) but I do have my finger on the pulse that there 
have been things in the works. See https://canonical.com/blog/real-time-linux-qa[4] 
for more information.

-- 
Erich Eickmeyer
Project Leader - Ubuntu Studio
Member - Ubuntu Community Council

--------
[1] https://ubuntustudio.org/ubuntu-studio-installer
[2] https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle
[3] https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuStudio/RealTimeKernel
[4] https://canonical.com/blog/real-time-linux-qa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20221001/82806a62/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-users/attachments/20221001/82806a62/attachment.sig>