[Bug 732688] Re: irc #rooms persistent setting
Bug Watch Updater
732688 at bugs.launchpad.net
Sat Sep 15 16:22:17 UTC 2012
Launchpad has imported 4 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24614.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-10-19T04:08:30+00:00 Will Thompson wrote:
There are two main use cases for Close() on a MUC not actually leaving
the room:
• If Empathy crashes, MC calls Close() on all channels it was handling. I'd rather not leave all the channels on my IRC proxy when that happens. (This is Idle bug #24273.)
• Marco is in an XMPP MUC with three of his friends, who sporadically discuss Aqua. He doesn't want to have the conversation window open constantly, cluttering his desktop, but wants to be in the room in case someone says something.
If we make Close() not actually leave the room (depending on
RemoveMembers() for that) it needs to be opt-in until Telepathy 1.0. Rob
suggests adding a property for this behaviour which could be requested,
or set by the handler.
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/732688/comments/0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-12-29T09:27:03+00:00 Mikhail Zabaluev wrote:
Another case where it is useful, and already implemented, are Skype chats.
How about an interface, providing a (requestable) property like "LeaveWhenClosed" and method Leave? In Maemo, we have the latter for Skype-specific chat add-ons interface.
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/732688/comments/1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-11-23T08:58:22+00:00 Will Thompson wrote:
> How about an interface, providing a (requestable) property like
> "LeaveWhenClosed"
That means the channel requester has to know whether the handler
supports this new method. I wonder whether we could use
<http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/spec/Client_Handler.html#org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Client.Handler.Capabilities>
for this? Technically it's imperfect, because if you have two handlers
installed—one with and one without this feature—the CM can't tell them
apart. But it might be good enough.
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/732688/comments/2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-09-15T15:44:05+00:00 Freedesktop-bugs wrote:
Similar bug in Empathy:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599184
And downstream Ubuntu:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libtelepathy/+bug/732688
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/732688/comments/10
** Changed in: libtelepathy
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
** Changed in: libtelepathy
Importance: Unknown => Medium
** Changed in: empathy
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
** Changed in: empathy
Importance: Unknown => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Telepathy, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732688
Title:
irc #rooms persistent setting
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/732688/+subscriptions
More information about the Ubuntu-telepathy
mailing list