[Ubuntu-US-CA] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hour#West_Coast

[Michael Paoli]

I've updated https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hour#West_Coast for California
to refer to:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Projects/UbuntuHours#Current_Ubuntu_Hours
rationale:
California information on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hour#West_Coast
was very out-of-date (some of it more than 4 years out-of-date).
Shouldn't have what should be essentially same information
redundantly listed in manner probable to be/become conflicting/inconsistent.

> From: "Michael Paoli" <Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu>
> To: "Ubuntu US California" <ubuntu-us-ca at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Subject: California Ubuntu Hours - for the California team to consider
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 23:39:14 -0800

> I notice California Ubuntu Hours (at least more generally), listed,
> at least in part, on both:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Hour
> and also:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CaliforniaTeam/Projects/UbuntuHours#Current_Ubuntu_Hours
> ... including also lots of inconsistent (and also relatively  
> outdated) information
> between the two.  Might it make much more sense to mostly list them  
> on *one* of
> those two pages (I'd think/presume the latter), and have the other  
> (presumably
> former) mostly just refer to the latter.
>
> Fine to *also* have the individual occurrences of the events listed,  
> e.g. as on:
> http://loco.ubuntu.com/events/global/2979/
> http://loco.ubuntu.com/events/global/3286/
> etc., and good to also have the more general listing, but things should
> be as consistent as feasible, and avoid unwarranted duplication - especially
> when such gives conflicting information.
>
> E.g., also, if Ubuntu Hour for a given location (e.g. city) doesn't always
> happen each month, or at same place each month, that should be reasonably
> clear, and folks should be referred to location or resource for (more)
> definitive/current information (e.g. listing of individual events).
>
> Listing/linking and encouraging folks to RSVP for something that happened
> over 4 years ago, also doesn't look so great (yes, seems some editing is
> called for).
>
> Anyway, just kind'a noticed, and sayin'.