[CoLoCo] 32 or 64

[David L. Willson]

No extra parts in server.  Where desktop is a pepperoni pizza, server is
like a slab of bread in a circle shape, with preconfigured pizza packs
downloadable.

On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:27 -0700, Dave Vanderploeg wrote:
> Other than the GUI, whats different between server and desktop?
> 
> Dave
> 
> On Nov 5, 2007, at 4:20 PM, "David L. Willson" <DLWillson at TheGeek.NU>  
> wrote:
> 
> > 64.  32 not needed for anything anymore, I think, but not sure.  The
> > only reason I backed out was flash.  Not a big deal on a server, eh?
> >
> > Also, gnome/XFCE/whatever can be installed on ubuntu-server, for what
> > it's worth.
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:14 -0700, Dave Vanderploeg wrote:
> >> Hey, I need to set up a new backup/fax server for my work and I need
> >> some advice. Should I use 32 I'd 64 bit? Besides Rsync backups and
> >> hylafax (which I haven't used before) people might ocassionaly hop on
> >> to surf the web or print documents. That's it, other than possibly
> >> dl'ing torrents. I considered the server version but I think having
> >> the GUI will come in handy, since I'm a little thick when it comes to
> >> the terminal.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Ubuntu-us-co mailing list
> > Ubuntu-us-co at lists.ubuntu.com
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-us-co
>