ubuntu goes prime-time in US

[Asko Kauppi]

As an irrelevant note of a OS X, Win32, Linux mix-user:

Fonts in Ubuntu Open Office sometimes _do_ look nice, and sometimes 
not.  Really.  Sometimes the same Excel sheet has smooth fonts, 
sometimes blockery you-know-what I mean.

The point is not getting truck-loads of "twist this and.." instructions 
on what may be wrong. The point is that this happens.  And I'm one of 
those that just want Things to Work.  Reliably.  Every time.  
Therefore, I favor the side of the girl in this plot. :D

- Asko Kauppi, Finland


14.4.2005 kello 16:22, Colin Watson kirjoitti:

  On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 08:05:28PM -0400, JohnOfArc wrote:
>> Veronica Mars (UPN), 4/12- Veronica happens upon the following
>> conversation in library?, computer room?- guy: "wait, how can you even
>> have an opinion on Ubuntu if you haven't tried it? 2-6 kernel, live 
>> cd,
>> they even had Gnome 2.0 (sic) the day Warty Warthog (!!) came out". 
>> girl:
>> "I'm sorry, I'm perfectly content with OS X"... something about
>> deamplified (anybody care to enlighten me- Google yields nada) fonts 
>> (in
>> Ubuntu); retort by guy- "the fonts aren't deamplified, and it's free
>
> It sounded like "uglified" and "are deuglified" respectively to me.
>
> -- 
> Colin Watson                                       
> [cjwatson at ubuntu.com]
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>