Ubuntu's unstable vs Debian unstable

[Oliver Grawert]

hi,
On Mi, 2005-11-30 at 17:18 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hello,
> >From what I read on the lists it seems that Ubuntu's unstable is
> generally more broken than Debian's, making me feel safer using Sid.
> Could anyone confirm this.
nope, this really depends who is ahead of whom :)
for breezy ubuntu did the Xorg and gcc4 transition ahead of debian which
resulted in many broken packages, for dapper this might be the other way
around, since sid just transitions several things now ...

both are simply development versions and break from time to time,
depending on low level changes, there is no "safer"

ciao
	oli
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20051130/11836b4d/attachment.sig>