Problem!

[Phil]

I think this debate is over... considering that the vast majority of email
clients and webmail (like gmail) group email together by conversation it is
irrevalent how people post... you look at the subject and then if you like
what the topic is you read further...

I do not see why some much energy is wasted on such a trivial topic?

On 2/3/06, Billy Pollifrone <billy at silverbaseball.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/3/06, Heinrich Rebehn <rebehn at ant.uni-bremen.de> wrote:
> >
> > Billy Pollifrone wrote:
> > > No that anyone wanted my opinion on the subject, but it is just was
> > easy to
> > > hit the Ctrl-Home key combination to reach the end as is the Ctrl-End
> > key
> > > combination to reach the beginning.
> >
> > This is true, but if you consider a lengthy thread, where several
> > posters mix top- and bottom-posting, it becomes quite hard to read!
> >
> >
> Now that I can agree with. It does make it easier to follow if regardless
> of the convention the OP chooses to use, then followups to it should follow
> the original convention.
>
> In anycase, it's not as bad as pages of quoted text and you get to the end
> and it's a one word reply. ;-)
>
> --
> ubuntu-users mailing list
> ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20060203/bed796ed/attachment.html>