GPL compliance

[Mario Vukelic]

On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 19:42 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> The GPL *is*
> permission to redistribute and re-license 

Actually it is permission to redistribute. The term "re-license" in this
context is kinda ambiguous - it could being allowed to rerelease the
GPL'ed code under another license (which only the actual copyright
holder(s) can do).  
I know that you mean the correct thing and it's only an accident, but I
have to remark on it, otherwise Gary might get even more confused.