VMWare / Wine
Derek Broughton
news at pointerstop.ca
Fri Feb 23 13:11:46 UTC 2007
Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> Derek Broughton wrote:
>> Ouattara Oumar Aziz wrote:
>>
>>> I'll tell you what I thing are the main differences between Wine (and
>>> its forks : Cedega and CrossOverOffice) and VMware :
>>>
>>> Wine :
>>> - no need for windows license
>>
>> Legally, or practically? Many things you might run under Wine are
>> _legally_ required to have a Windows license.
>
> That's simply not true.
You keep doing that to me. It IS true.
> Components of Windows need a Windows license,
> but there's a whole lot of Windows software that isn't even put out by
> Microsoft.
Of course there is. I didn't say you couldn't run any software under Wine.
In fact lots of good software does run under Wine, and legally (at least in
my non-legal opinion), too.
However, as I said, _many_ applications are legally required to have a
Windows license. I think you'll find that almost all Microsoft software
EULAs specifically require you to have a Windows license, plus any software
that requires any DLLs or fonts or any other Windows component, that has
not been freely released by Microsoft.
--
derek
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list