Re: AMD64 vs. i386, any new observations?

Tue Oct 2 01:51:29 UTC 2007

We run Ubuntu 64bit AMD & Intel exclusively on our servers and I run Ubuntu Desktop on and 3.0Gbit 64bit Intel desktop. No issues.

-Dee
  _____  

From: Twist O'Connor [mailto:takuachronicler at gmail.com]
To: Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions [mailto:ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com]
Sent: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:02:01 -0800
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs. i386, any new observations?

well im still trying to get my ubuntu to work... im using amd so when i finaly get it to work ill tell you guys how it did :P

On 10/1/07, Ari Torhamo <ari.torhamo at saunalahti.fi> wrote:  
On ma, 2007-10-01 at 12:37 -0400, Michael R. Head wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 11:40 +0300, Ari Torhamo wrote:  
> > On su, 2007-09-30 at 22:53 -0400, Michael R. Head wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 19:42 -0700, Twist O'Connor wrote:
> > > > what you CAN do is just use wine and then download the windows version  
> > > > of firefox.... then flash will work fine
> > >
> > > Does firefox and flash work fine on wine on amd64?
> >
> >
> > Works fine here on my AMD64 installation. Flash was slow on many pages  
> > until a couple of days ago, when I got compiz to work on my system. For
> > some reason that seems to have made flash to work faster. Or then it was
> > just a well timed coincidence.
>  
> Is that the native apps or the win64 apps under wine?

The native applications. I have little experience of wine and none in
AMD64.

Ari

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
  ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20071001/0ed35190/attachment.html>