spamassassin problem

[Derek Broughton]

Gerald Dachs wrote:

> Am Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:44:50 +0000
> schrieb Andrew Doades <ard at gpdnet.co.uk>:
> 
>> Thanks for the help, but I just got it, I need to have my mail passed
>> trough procmail, then spamassassin.
> 
> Not necessary, there is a much better approach. Use amavisd-new,

What makes it a "much" better approach?  I'm not a fan of spamassassin, as
the versions I used to use (I understand it's much better now) weren't
nearly as accurate or fast as bogofilter, but I don't see the value of
amavis at all.
-- 
derek