4 GB USB memory arrived

Karl Auer kauer at biplane.com.au
Sat May 24 17:20:37 UTC 2008


Karl Larsen wrote:
>     I may have. It is clearly /dev/sdf1 and if I try $ sudo umount
>  /dev/sdf it says it is not loaded. With $sudo umount /dev/sdf1 it works.
>  Do you have any idea why it is bad?

To answer this specific question more specifically :-) you mount
formatted partitions (filesystems), not entire devices. So /dev/sdf
wasn't mounted, /dev/sdf1 was.

it isn't "bad" you are just misunderstanding what's going on.

Common usage is confusing, because we speak of "mounting a disk" or
"mounting a memory stick" which is not strictly true. What we mount are
filesystems, which in these cases are actually formatted partitions on
those devices.

Regards, K.

PS: It gets more complicated with network file systems, virtual
filesystems and the like. For many of these things there is no
"partition" involved. The general statement still holds true - we mount
filesystems, not raw devices.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: DD23 0DF3 2260 3060 7FEC 5CA8 1AF6 D9E3 CFEE 6B28
Public key at  : random.sks.keyserver.penguin.de

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20080525/1f283323/attachment.sig>


More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list