Karmic 9.10 new kernel BAD!

[Leonard Chatagnier]

--- On Tue, 12/1/09, Andrew Farris <flyindragon1 at aol.com> wrote:

From: Andrew Farris <flyindragon1 at aol.com>
Subject: Re: Karmic 9.10 new kernel BAD!
To: "Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 7:49 PM

On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 17:39 -0800, NoOp wrote:
> On 12/01/2009 05:29 PM, Leonard Chatagnier wrote:
[snip]
> >>     I posted it 3 times. I tried to write a bug but that is 
> >> broken. I am real tired of your request's.
> >> 
> >> 73 Karl
> > 
> > Sigh... Nope.
> > 
> > I give up.
> > NoOp. I think he did give the kernels in question.  It was the -14 good one and the -15 bad one.  The same one I'm having trouble with.  Only his is 32 bit; mine 64 bit.  We may have a threading issue here as I did use web mail in my posts and your post suggest you didn't see it.  HTH
> 
> If he did, the post is not available in the archives:
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2009-December/subject.html>
> 
> Perhaps I miss one?

For what it's worth, I've been following this through Evolution, not
webmail, and I never saw an email from Karl with the offending kernels
listed....only the 4 describing how broken launchpad is right now.

Already checked the spam-nets, and there weren't any messages in them.
Maybe some messages aren't getting through to everybody.

Something's is wrong as he replied to my request for the data.  It did
come through on more than one email.  If I can still find it in my trash folder I'll send it to you.
Leonard Chatagnier

lenc5570 at sbcglobal.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/attachments/20091201/061a01d1/attachment.html>