Upgrading Evolution/Express/Mac-equivalent

[Karl F. Larsen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Amedee @ Ubuntu wrote:
> On Wed, July 22, 2009 19:28, Piper wrote:
>> Why wouldn't Evolution or Express be improved or upgraded? And what does
>> the Mac OS call its emailer?
>>
>> So these are three email servers allowed by Shaw and other ISPs.
> 
> Evolution is not a mail server.
> Evolution is a mail CLIENT.
> Why do you deliberately get that wrong, over and over again?

	People not trained do not know the difference between a "server" and a
"client"


> 
> Express does not exist.
> It is called Outlook Express.

	And Outlook Express is a Windows email client that Evolution seems to
emulate.

> Why do you deliberately use the wrong name for that software?
> And Outlook Express isn't an email server either.
> 
>> If they are improved Shaw won't allow them? Is that political?
> 
> *sigh*
> Can't argue with a stone...
> 
> I had written a really, *really* nasty reply first, but I deleted that
> because I want to follow the Ubuntu Code of Conduct.
> 
> The questions have been answered, you don't like the answer, then stop
> bothering the people here. Draw your own conclusions.
> 
> 
	I have not seen much from this person of late.
> I would *really* appreciate it if someone from the Community Council or
> some other Powers That Be put an end to these pointless questions.
> 
73 Karl


- --

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.
        Key ID = 3951B48D

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFKZ5MQNuSIOjlRtI0RAksnAJ9G5h6DR0PdEnBqVcoWPGuYvoySXgCgjM0p
mElE1awbGrgrGSP1O8vBINU=
=WYMX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----