Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)
Basil Chupin
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Tue Apr 6 10:04:28 UTC 2010
On 06/04/10 18:35, Fred A. Miller wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 04:09 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
>
>> On 06/04/10 17:08, Fred A. Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 04/06/2010 02:51 AM, Grizzly wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 05 April 2010 at 21:29, Fred A. Miller
>>>> Enlightened me with this:-Re: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 04/05/2010 02:55 PM, Grizzly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5 Apr 2010 at 23:34, Basil Chupin wrote: Ubuntu 10.04 BETA1 (Lucid) (at
>>>>>> least in part)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is not meant to provoke a desktop or a distro war, so read it in
>>>>>>> this light.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can I "upgrade" to 10.4(beta) from 9.10 direct or do I need to start a fresh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You can upgrade.....I did one 2 days ago
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I tried last night, expected time to install was 2:49 @ 23:00 it dropped to
>>>> 2:30 by 23:48 (getting mew packages) so I went to bed and left it running :-<
>>>>
>>>> This morning @ 07:30 it was up to 3:26 (installing packages) so I gave up
>>>>
>>>> should it take that long to upgrade, I havnt got the fastest ADSL line but it
>>>> does run @ 1.4mb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> 'Wouldn't think so. I haven't run Ubuntu for that long, but at no time
>>> have I noted any of the servers being that slow.
>>>
>>> Fred
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> As far as I am concerned, they *ARE* slow :-( . I get thruout of around
>> 17Kbs/s or less. If I get up to 50+Kbs/s I am laughing.
>>
>>
> Yes, but you live in the "land down under," so data has to travel a
> great distance. :)
>
> Fred
>
Sheesh! You know nutin' :-( .
Things flow quicker when they are going *downhill* so I ought to be
getting the data *MUCH* faster.
BC
--
In a period of great joy and pleasure you are comforted by the thought that tragedy is just around the corner.
More information about the ubuntu-users
mailing list