Installer partitioner project, dif Debian Ubuntu, lvm, UUID, GPartEd, GRUB, HAL

Karl Larsen klarsen1 at gmail.com
Tue Apr 27 20:56:49 UTC 2010


On 04/27/2010 02:30 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
> I'd appreciate an answer on these questions from any knowledgeable person,&  especially would really like to hear from the maintainer of the partioner on the alternate installer - please tell me if that is you, thanks. :)
>
> ==
> I'm seeing what I think are GRUB&  partitioner issues in Ubuntu 10.04 (probably starting around 9.10), where Ubuntu, IIRC, introduced UUIDs&  GRUB2(?).  With a Ub9.10 install on a laptop (adding on to a 9.04, with additional partitions,&  having a windows first partition), I can't create a partition in the 10GB free space.  When I did the 9.10 install, it did something strange, hard to explain, something like causing my boot into 9.04 to use the proper kernel, but be using the data space/partition from 9.10. Also, IIRC, I had 2 partitions that gparted showed had the same uuid.
>
> I ran Debian from about 1998-2005,&  Ubuntu from 2005-2010.  I only use the "alternate" installer, so that I can custom set my partitions.  I've never had problems like this before Ub 9.10.
>
> ==
> My questions are largely about the difference between what Debian has/is been/doing,&  what Ubuntu began doing in the past release or two, wrt the partitioner, GRUB, LVM,&  UUIDs, HAL, etc.
>
> IIRC, Ubuntu began doing stuff differently than Debian, like with UUIDs,&  now, from the release notes on Ub 10.4, they say they are now removing their addition of HAL (UUIDs?) in order to enable faster bootup.
> "This release fully removes HAL from the boot process, making Ubuntu faster to boot and faster to resume from suspend."
> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004overview
>
> Did ubuntu do something unwise with making use of UUIDs,&  now they are backtracking?  Did Debian do any of that?
>
> Here's my post&  thread from yesterday with more info:
> 10.4 Partition Disks Error Unable satisfy constraints, overlapping partitions
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/2010-April/216652.html
> With this error message from the alternate installer partitioner:
> "Partition Disks>  Error: Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition
>   : Can't have overlapping partitions."
> (Note: it failed to give any useful numerics, ex partition overlap positions, that would enable progress if seeing what was wrong, or determining if there was a bug in the partitioner sw.)
>    
     You were using Gpart were you not? Your complaints mirror my own 
but I did something smart.
I RTFM by clicking on help while I had Gparted displaying my laptop 
partitions. It told me exactly what to do and it worked.


> What sw is the partitioner in the alternate installer? parted? fdisk? other????
>
> GPartEd (0.4.3) from 9.04, fully apt updated, (&  the "help" doesn't exist), on an install on a different machine, where I put a data partition in the extended partition, for info about the "lvm2" "filesystem" there, says "Warning: Logical Volume Management is not yet supported".  Has that been fixed yet?  What's the state of LVM in current Debian&  Ubuntu?
>
>    
         You should see Help on Gparted any version.

> ==
> What new things Ubuntu is doing, wrt these issues, is being put into Debian?  Is debian usin HAL, UUIDs, LVM, GFUB2, etc??
>
> ==
>    
         I can assure you 9.10 and 10.04 both use the ext4 filesystem 
and Grub2 which is much better than Grub1. These are what I use and yes 
there are some minor problems.

> Well, there are so many questions here, cause there seem to be several deficiencies in various parts of the sw Ubuntu is/has beenusing/used (partitioner in installer, GRUB2, LVM, HAL), I'm looking for any knowledgeable info regarding the current state&  cautions&  future likely status of all this.  Any&  all knowledgeable insight greatly/advice appreciated.
>
> Thanks.  :)
>
> ==
> (I'm asking this exact same post/questions on both the Debian&  Ubuntu lists, in case you wish to look to the other list for their replies.)
>
> 	I try not to copy what others wrote you. There are thousands of happy users of 9.10 and the new 10.04 so your problems are due to your computer or yourself, or both. Start finding out what is really the problem

73 Karl



-- 

	Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
	Linux User
	#450462   http://counter.li.org.
         Key ID = 3951B48D






More information about the ubuntu-users mailing list