Ubuntu 10.04 LTS released

[Chris]

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:22:08 +0300 (EEST)
"Nikolai K. Bochev" <n.bochev at grandstarco.com> wrote:

> Oh i missed the part where you say that you have rc installed. In
> that case just apt-get update, no need for dist-upgrade :)
> 
> Upgrading from previous releases using the
> update-manager/do-release-upgrade has certain benefits ( from what is
> visible as output ):
> 
> 1. It warns you if you have low disk space needed for the upgrade.
> 2. It aborts if your memory is not enough to handle the upgrade.
> 3. It searches and removes obsolete packages that are left over from
> previous releases. 4. It's the "official" way of doing things, so if
> you go whining that you did apt-get dist-upgrade and something went
> poo on places like ubuntuforums.org you might get a bit of heat ( not
> that i think it would be a problem for you after 3-4 years of
> Gentoo ). For me it's sort of like the sudo argument.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> Wait, that's a guide to upgrade from 9.10. I have 10.04 release
> candidate.
> 
> the Update manager indeed gives me several packages to update. Is this
> the correct route from a RC to a full release too? (probably yes,
> but...)
> 
> Also -isn't upgrading from synaptic / apt-get the same, and if not,
> why (that is: what does the update manager do under the hood?)
> 
> thanks,
> m.
> 


This what I did also (a simple apt-get update/upgrade). After that I
noticed that both /etc/issue and /etc/issue.net  both reflect Ubuntu
10.04 LTS

-- 
Regards,

Chris

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the
government fears the people, there is liberty."

           -- Thomas Jefferson